Adding 4 Big 12 schools would improve distribution.. -- Old Line Hokie 06/17/2016 11:15AM
I think the PAC12 has a luxury that the ACC doesn't have... -- Mr. Touchdown 06/17/2016 10:46AM
I see it very differently... -- jesuisvtguy 06/18/2016 05:00AM
Tens of millions less people there and college sports are not as relevant. -- chuckd4vt 06/18/2016 01:34AM
Love that model. It's ALREADY worth $800 million. -- chuckd4vt 06/16/2016 10:04PM
Read it again. to make the profit now, they have to sell. to get -- daveinop 06/17/2016 08:03AM
Understand. But they've been doing SOMETHING. Cashing some checks already. -- chuckd4vt 06/17/2016 3:05PM
Or you could try to address the conundrum raised by the author -- daveinop 06/17/2016 5:10PM
The take the money now or wait till later question isn't a bad one. ** -- chuckd4vt 06/18/2016 01:31AM
I'm not so bullish on the pac12n model -- ren_hoek 06/17/2016 06:57AM
What are you going to say if the ACCNetwork is nowhere near the SECNetwork? -- chuckd4vt 06/17/2016 3:08PM
ESPN owns the ACC's tier 3 content. The Pac 12 kept their tier 3 and a lot -- ChrisLords 06/18/2016 11:40PM
Agree to disagree -- ren_hoek 06/17/2016 4:46PM
Relying to ESPN to force providers to pay for ACCN -- Colonel Jessup 06/18/2016 08:05AM
Even though the Pac-12N model may not be generating as much revenue -- VTHokie2000 06/16/2016 5:56PM
The weakness is they have no leverage in distribution and fees -- daveinop 06/17/2016 08:07AM
But they're increasing it slowly but surely. And they aren't sharing profit -- chuckd4vt 06/17/2016 3:12PM
Rinse, repeat** -- daveinop 06/17/2016 5:14PM
Since no one knows what the future will be in terms of distribution -- VTHokie2000 06/17/2016 12:04PM
Larry Scott claims that his way is better. -- HOO86 06/16/2016 8:16PM